1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued LIC9099-C page 3
The facility had plenty of meat, chicken, chicken patties, beef, steak, ground beef, hamburger patties, pork chops, pork roast, fish, turkey, hot dogs, corn dogs, burritos, pizza, sausages, lunch meat, cold cuts, variety of frozen vegetables, beans, mixed vegetables, stir fry vegetables, peas, corn, French fries, variety of canned vegetables, fruit cups, apple sauce, peanut butter, strawberry preserves, milk, eggs, cheese, yogurt, variety of breads, white & wheat bread, dinner rolls, hot buns, hamburgers bun, flour & corn tortilla, cereals, rice, noodles, pasta, macaroni & cheese, potatoes, cookies, chips, crackers, fresh fruits, apples, oranges, bananas, grapes, melons, cantaloupe, plums, prunes, tomatoes, fresh vegetables, onions, garlic, potatoes, carrots, sweet potatoes, broccoli, celery, lettuce, red peppers, bell peppers, variety of canned fruits, cookies, chips, crackers, desserts, flour, sugar, coffee cream, beverages, coffee, juice, milk, sodas, water, a variety of seasoning and sauces, ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise, ripe olives, mushrooms, and etc. LPA Bunker observed an ample supply of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. R1-R6 stated they were not only served cold cereal, they are happy with the food portions, they are allowed seconds, and eat a variety of food. R1-R6 stated they had no problem with the food and they get plenty of food to eat. S1-S2 stated residents are getting enough food to eat and residents are not served cold cereal 5-6 days a week for breakfast. S1-S2 and R1-R2 stated if residents don't like what is being served residents have alternative options to choose something else that is not on the menu. S1-S2 and R1-R6 denied the allegation.
Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. |