1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Client #1 and dated 01/01/18. Based on interviews Client #1 was adequately supervised and facility staff conducted general body checks and room checks (approximately) 3:00 p.m. and at 8:00 p.m. every day – checking for sharp objects, alcohol, and drugs. Client #1 was provided with their prescribed medications as their diagnosis was well managed (minimal agitation/pacing). [A review of Client #1’s medication administration record (February 2022) documented that the client’s prescribed medications were administered by facility staff (via signatures) and there was no documentation of a physician’s order for methamphetamines prescribed to the client.] Facility staff adequately administered Client #1’s medications as the client’s symptoms lessened and displayed mild behavior and was less agitated and stabilized. Facility allowed Client #1 to come and go from the facility. [A review of client’s “Physician’s Report” (dated 01/18/22) under “Capacity for Self-Care” documented that Client #1 was “able to leave facility unassisted”.] Client #1 got the street drugs outside of the facility and when Client #1 returned to the facility, the client walked in front of their room and passed out; and facility staff called 9-1-1 (approximately) 1:30 p.m. (A review of Client #1’s facility records: “House Rules” entitled “No Alcohol and/or Illegal Drugs Policy” was signed by Client #1 and dated 01/01/18.) Although the facility was aware of Client #1’s prior history with street drugs, facility staff were unable to prevent the client from accessing those drugs outside of the facility.
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and medical records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF SUPERVISION: “Resident(s) under the influence of drugs and alcohol while in care” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding Allegation #3: this investigation revealed based on virtual interviews conducted of Facility Staff (S1 – S4) corroborated that they have not received complaints from clients or conservator/responsible person/family member that they’ve had their personal property or valuable items missing. Facility staff also confirmed that the facility does not provide scrubs to the clients; as facility staff members are the ones to wear scrubs during their work shift. Facility staff confirmed that they receive in-service training on the topic of client’s personal rights on an annual basis. [Facility staff “In-Service Training” records on the topic of “Client/Resident Personal Rights” and Client #1’s facility records entitled, “Client/Resident Personal Rights” (dated 01/01/22).] LPA/RA Ceniceros interviewed Clients (C2, C3, C4, C9) who corroborated that they have not had to report personal property or valuable items missing nor had they observed other clients wearing scrubs due to missing their clothing. [Facility records entitled, “Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables” (dated 02/04/14); staff work schedules & roster (February 2022), and clients’ roster (February 2022)] were reviewed.]
(Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C)
|