1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM LIC9099-C
Regarding the allegation that Resident developed sepsis due to neglect from facility staff, the following has been concluded: Based on a review of R1’s physician report and medical records, R1 had a history of urinary tract infections and sepsis due to the use of a Catheter and is stated to have developed a resistance to many antibiotics.
R1 was admitted to the facility with additional care provided by Hoag Home Health nursing staff under the supervision of W1, Nurse Practitioner for Hoag in addition to Registered Nurse (RN) W2 who was hired and paid for separately by R1’s family. Approximately one week before R1 was sent to Hoag Hospital to be evaluated on May 17, 2023, facility staff noticed R1’s urine was dark and had a foul odor. After testing, it was determined Lonnie had a UTI. W1 prescribed Amoxicillin Antibiotics for R1’s condition with no noticeable results. W1 then prescribed a different antibiotic for R1, who ended up transferring to Hoag Hospital before the new antibiotic was delivered at the facility.
Medical professionals assigned to R1’s care while at the facility were actively treating his chronic conditions. When it was determined the treatment/medication was not effective, he was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment as required by Title 22 regulations.
Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the allegation that Resident developed sepsis due to neglect from facility staff is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Regarding the allegation that Resident is malnourished due to staff neglect, the following has been concluded: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff and witnesses, there is no evidence that facility staff failed to provide adequate nutrition to resident R1 based on his individual needs. Evidence of caloric malnutrition were apparent in the slow rate of healing of R1’s pressure injuries and in testimony made by W1, however the investigation could not corroborate that the caloric malnutrition described was not a result of the resident’s pre-existing conditions documented in the records reviewed. At the time of his discharge from Skilled Nursing, R1 was documented as having the following diagnosis: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Pseudomonas Urinary Tract Infection, Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Malignant neoplasm of lower and middle lobe, presence of a prosthetic heart valve as well as a pre-existing instance of sepsis. As a result, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. |