1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPAs observed Resident #1 (R1) tied to a wheelchair. On 10/5/20, LPAs conducted an on-site inspection and interviewed 12 residents, 11 staff and observed Resident #2 (R2) locked in their room and Resident #3 (R3) and Resident #4 (R4) locked in an isolated wing of Facility. LPAs interviewed Staff #1 (S1) who stated they witnessed residents being tied up and that this is a common occurrence, this statement was corroborated by Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) who stated they observed other residents being tied up. In addition, Seven (7) staff interviewed admitted that the Facility had a pattern and practice of tying up residents. LPAs interviewed Staff #2 (S2) who indicated staff regularly lock resident rooms when the residents are outside of their rooms. Staff #3 (S3) disclosed that Administrator Melchor De Leon instructed staff to stop reporting resident falls and similar incidents directly to CCLD but to instead report internally to the administrator. As a result of this internal reporting procedure, multiple falls and similar incidents were reported internally but not reported to CCLD. Administrator Melchor De Leon confirmed that Facility was not reporting incidents as they were occurring.
Based on interviews, documents, and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.
The violation of residents’ personal rights resulting from Facility locking residents in their rooms was previously cited during a Case Management Visit on 10/7/20.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator via tele-visit a copy of the report along with appeal rights was sent via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving of the report. Administrator agrees to review, agrees to send the signed report via email. |