1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that a resident's incontinent needs are not being met: it was alleged that facility staff were repeatedly notified that R1 was running low on incontinence supplies, did not order incontinence supplies for R1, and R1 had to purchase incontinence supplies from another resident. When interviewed, R1 stated that they had been receiving incontinence supplies for free from the facility for the last two years, but that recently facility staff claimed that they had spoken to R1’s doctor and R1’s doctor and medical records indicated that R1 does not need incontinence supplies and R1 was told by facility staff that if they wanted incontinence supplies, they would have to pay an extra charge. LPA interviewed AD who was unable to provide information regarding this allegation. LPA interviewed COO and one facility staff who stated that residents like R1 who were placed by Los Angeles County were provided incontinence supplies by the facility at no extra charge if their physician’s report indicated they needed incontinence supplies, that they are unaware of any issues with R1 and incontinence supplies, that R1 did not need incontinence supplies because they were able to use the restroom and were not incontinent, and that the facility did not regularly supply R1 with incontinence supplies. LPA reviewed R1’s Resident Appraisal dated June 22, 2018, which indicates R1 does not need help with toileting or incontinence. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report dated September 9, 2019, and Physician’s Report dated October 8, 2019, which indicate R1 is not able to care for their own toileting needs but does not have incontinence. LPA reviewed R1’s Admission Agreement dated June 22, 2018, which indicates that the facility is not responsible for providing or paying for incontinence supplies, that R1 is responsible for paying for incontinence supplies, and that R1 was not paying for incontinence supplies. LPA interviewed eight additional residents and did not obtain information corroborating this allegation. No information was obtained corroborating the allegation because the information obtained showed that R1 did not have incontinence needs.
The Department has investigated the above allegation and found it to be Unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened, or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative. |