1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not timely address a client's change in medical condition. The complaint alleges resident (R1) did not have a bowel movement in weeks, was in extreme pain, and upon visual observation the resident's abdomen was distended. It was reported that staff did not know R1's medical history. Four (4) residents were interviewed. All residents stated they are regularly taken to doctor appointments. Resident (R1) stated they have history of constipation and did not have major stomach pain or vomiting until 11/1/2025, but had been experiencing stomach pain for at least 1 week. Staff interviews revealed that R1 has had multiple visits with Gastroentorologist and primary care physician to address constipation. On July 14, 2025, R1 had an initial appointment with the GI specialist that determined the resident needed a CT scan. This was the initial visit from the referral. It was determined that the resident needed to get an authorization for a CT scan . The CT scan was performed on September 22, 2025. CT scan results were provided until October 28, 2025, which determined that R1 had severe bowel retention and a colonoscopy was needed within 2-3 weeks.
The emergency hospital visit on November 1, 2025 resulted in an emergency bowel resection surgery to remove bowel obstruction. LPA reviewed facility documents: hospital discharge orders, Quarterly Progress Report states R1 has history of somatic complaints i.e., abdominal pain and records of Medical Care dates 12/19/2024. 4/22/25, 6/3/2025, 6/12/25, 7/14/25, 9/23/25, and 10/28/2025. Subsequent visits [6/12/25, and 7/14/25, 9/22/25] addressed gastrointestinal bloating, distention, and CT scan exams. On July 14, 2025, a GI exam was completed due to enlarged abdomen. On October 28, 2025, R1 had a follow-up medical visit to obtain CT scan results. The findings indicate the resident's abdominal pain and constipation were addressed prior to the emergency medical incident. There is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted with House Manager Edika Herrera. A copy of the report was issued. |