1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident/Client Roster, Staff Roster, Interviews conducted by Community Care Licensing-Investigations Branch-Staff Interviews, Client Interviews, Interview of Client#1’s (C1) Case Worker, Investigations Branch-Investigation Report completed 2/24/2025, Copies of Client#1 (C1): Identification and Emergency Information, Physician’s Report for Community Care Facilities (LIC 602), Superior Court of The State of California Letter of Conservatorship dated 06/20/2024, Preplacement Appraisal Information (LIC 603), Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (LIC 625), Admissions Agreement dated 12/13/2024, Copies of Staff#1 (S1): Application for Employment, Personnel Record (LIC 501), S1 Employee Checklist, Initial Training -10 Hours documentation for S1, Timesheet 10/2024 for S1, photograph copies of text messages exchanged between C1 and S1, and physical plant tour.
The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation(s) Staff sexually abused a client- It is alleged S1 sexually abused C1 on 10/06/2024. Interviews conducted by Community Care Licensing-Investigations Branch, corroborated this allegation. Review of text messages exchanged by S1 and C1 revealed on 10/06/2024 around 11:40pm, S1 invited C1 to their car. C1 complied and sat in backseat of S1’s car with S1. Interview of C1 revealed S1 began to touch and fondle C1 repeatedly even after C1 told S1 “No.” Review of C1’s letters of conservatorship revealed C1 is conserved and “gravely disabled”. Interview of C1’s Case Worker revealed C1 is unable to consent to any sexual activity. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Staff had inappropriate interactions with clients- It is alleged S1 had inappropriate interactions with clients. Interviews conducted by Community Care Licensing-Investigations Branch, corroborated this allegation. Interview with S1 revealed the following, S1 admitted to texting C1 and stated, “I made a mistake by giving C1 my phone number, and I shouldn’t have done that.” S1 admitted they knew “it was inappropriate” to scratch C1’s back because S1 knew staff were not allowed to touch clients. S1 admitted it was a mistake to have given C1 money in the past even though C1 did not request the money. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
S1’s conduct is inimical to the health, welfare and safety of all clients in care; therefore, LPA Ramirez will issue one (1) type A deficiency for personal rights violation. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, 9099-D, and appeals rights was provided.
|