1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure client is provided adequate clothing.” It is alleged that staff are not ensuring C1 if fitted with proper clothing and provided adequate clothing. On 7/16/2026, LPA Ramirez conducted five (5) staff interviews and five (5) client interviews. Four (4) out of the five (5) staff interviewed corroborated the allegation. Staff interviews revealed that C1’s pants are very baggy, and their pants are always failing. Staff interviews revealed that C1 does not own a belt to keep their pants from failing. Staff interviews corroborated that C1 requires additional clothing that fits C1 according to their size. Four (4) out of the five (5) clients interviewed corroborated the allegation. Client interviews revealed that C1’s clothing is too “big” which causes C1 to unintentionally expose themselves around the facility. During tour of C1’s shared room, LPA Ramirez inspected C1’s dresser and closet. LPA Ramirez observed the following articles of clothing: three (3) pair of pants, three (3) long shorts, two (2) t-shirts, one (1) hooded sweater, one (1) pair of socks. LPA Ramirez did not observe undergarments. During record review of C1’s Client Personal Property and Valuables log, LPA observed one entry that listed one (1) bag of clothing was recorded on 02/27/2009. No additional entries were recorded. LPA obtained a copy of a retail store purchase for C1 dated 12/01/2025 and it revealed a four (4) pack of boys sweatpants was purchased.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1, are cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeals rights was provided. |