1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | for residents. LPA observed food being prepped and staff preparing the food for the residents who have restrictions. In addition, LPA obtained a copy of the facility weekly menu and always available menu for review and observed the food service to be well balanced with a variety of choices. LPA conducted interviews with the Food Service Director and indicated that food delivery is twice a week and resident have the choice to modify the menu to their liking as well as food being modified based on resident needs. Staff also indicated that when the ice cream machine is broken there is buckets of ice cream in the freezer that is used to serve to the residents. It is alleged that facility is in disrepair. Based on information received by the copy of microbial air sampling report, resident rooms affected is in building B and building A, 6th floor. Interviews conducted with 3 of 3 staff verified that they had received a complaint from a resident that resides in building B regarding mold and that is being addressed. LPA verified that complaint had been addressed on a previous facility complaint received on March 27, 2024. Testing done by a testing vendor indicated that testing was done in building A and the air sampling results show the office is safe for occupancy. Copies of documentation obtained of the microbial air sampling report page 1 indicates: Lead Tech Environmental (LTE) performed air sampling at the RSD Office located at 24552 Paseo Valencia, Laguna Hills, CA (“Office”). LTE performed the evaluation on March 20, 2024. As part of this evaluation, he took air samples for determination of non-viable fungi. The scope of sampling was limited to the collection of one interior sample and one exterior, control sample. He did not observe visible signs of mold. Based on the results of the air sampling, the microbial evaluation, and visual observations, the Office was safe for occupancy. The exterior/control sample contained a higher mold spore count than the interior air sample. Furthermore page 4 indicates: The air sample results show the Office is safe for occupancy. At the time of this writing, no Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) or Permissible Exposure Levels (PELs) for mold have been established. It should be noted that surfaces of construction and finishing materials, as well as indoor air, are not sterile, and that no structure is ever completely free of microbial contaminants. Under normal circumstances, under current industry guidelines, we would expect the levels of fungi in the indoor environment to be qualitatively and quantitatively lower or at most similar to the air outside of the residence. Based on the information on file for the facility CCLD licensure covers building A, floors 1-5. Building B and Building A floors 6-7 are independent living and is not covered under CCLD licensure for this facility.
Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with the facility representative and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility. |