1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099-A
Regarding the allegation that Resident doesn't feel safe at facility, the following has been concluded: Based on interviews conducted, records reviews and tour of the facility's physical plant, no items of non-compliance putting the resident's safety into jeopardy could be identified. After a suspicion of electrical issues was expressed by R1's family, facility maintenance staff along with Fire Marshall staff inspected the facility without finding any dysfunction needing to be addressed. As a result, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Regarding the allegation that Staff left resident unattended in feces for an extended period, the following has been concluded: According to video evidence obtained during the investigation, there was at least one instance of having diarrhea during which R1 expressed difficulty in obtaining assistance. The evidence provided did not sufficiently establish the exact time frame during which the resident was left unattended that night beyond the four minutes captured by video. As a result, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Regarding the allegation that Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect, the following has been concluded: Based on the review of records and interviews conducted, a consistent pattern of not allowing the resident with the dignity and respect required by facility staff could not be evidenced. As a result, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Regarding the allegation that Staff did not meet resident's needs, the following has been concluded: Facility staff states that they notified R1's conservator and relatives that the resident had reached a level of care incompatible with their remaining at the facility, however due to the duration of the resident's admission at the facility, facility staff eventually agreed to let the resident remain admitted there and to provide the required care and supervision there. Despite indications that care for R1 was complex, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the facility did not meet the resident's needs before their relocation to a different board and care. Thus, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. |