1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On September 30, 2026, at approximately 2:00 PM, during the records review, the Department examined the copy of R1s admission agreement, which states that visitors can come at any time but requests a phone call to the administrator if it is before 9am or after 6pm.
On September 30, 2026, at approximately 02:00 PM, the department interviewed (A#1). A1 shared that the visiting hours for the facility are from 8am-9pm and denied anyone ever being turned away to visit.
On September 30, 2026, two out of four witnesses confirmed the visitation hours and did not have any concerns about visits.. LPA was unable to speak with W1 and W4 stated that R1 has not lived at the new facility for over one year.
The department was unable to interview Resident #1 (R1) as they no longer reside at the residence. Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3) Resident #4 (R4) were unable to engage in any interviews. Resident #5 engaged in an interview but due to medical diagnosis, was unable to provide reliable information.
On September 30, 2026, the Department interviewed Staff 1-3(S#1-3). Two out of three staff members shared that the visiting hours are from 9am-7pm. One staff member shared that the visiting hours are from 8:30am-12pm and 2pm-4:45pm. Three out of three staff members confirmed that no visitors have ever been denied entry.
During this investigation, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegations.
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Florica Gheorghe, Administrator.
|