1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It is alleged that the resident sustained a fracture due to staff neglect. R1 is diagnosed with Dementia as noted in the Physician’s Report dated April 19, 2023. On May 28, 2023, R1 sustained a fall per the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UR). The investigation revealed that three out of the three staff confirmed during the interviews that R1 was able to walk without any physical assistance (e.g., walker, cane, or other person) however had unsteady gait prior to the fall. R1 received physical therapy to increase mobility and improve their gait as noted on the home health Progress Notes dated May 27, 2023. The Department reviewed the surveillance footage for May 28, 2023, capturing R1 falling face-down in an attempt to reach for the roommate’s left hand; and as a result, struck their right shoulder against the floor of the hallway. Based on interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, it is determined that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate R1 sustaining a fracture due to staff neglect as R1 was not evaluated as a fall risk. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
It is alleged that the staff are not meeting the resident’s laundry needs. In review of the staff’s personal laundry notes from January 2, 2023 to September 7, 2023, R1’s clothes were washed every Wednesdays. During those months, the staff was absent for three days: April 12, June 15, and June 16, 2023. Out of the three days, April 12th fell on a Wednesday which was the designated laundry day for R1. Staff stated that R1’s clothes were not washed on April 12th, however, were washed within the week. Per LPA’s review, staff could not recall nor has documented the day R1’s clothes were washed following their absence. Interviews conducted with a total of seven staff indicated that the resident’s clothing appeared clean. Five out of the seven staff confirmed that the dirty laundry was washed weekly while two out of the seven staff were unaware of the laundry schedule. Three out of the six residents expressed contentment with their weekly laundry service while two out of the six residents could not be interviewed as the residents exhibited cognitive impairments and disorientation. One remaining resident indicated that they did not opt to pay additional fees for the laundry service. Although the laundry notes for the week of April 12, 2023, did not document R1’s clothes were washed, the interviews reveal that R1’s clothing was observed to be clean in appearance. Therefore, the evidence obtained did not support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. |