1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the follow up visit on 04/14/23 and today’s visit LPA observed that C1 and C2 are no longer residing at the facility. LPA Ramirez was unable to locate and therefore unable to conduct interviews as C1 has a telephone number that is disconnected and C2 is currently living back at home with their mother. During the follow up visit on 04/14/23 and today’s visit clients appeared to be comfortable and at ease as evidence by smiling, laughing and by conversating with staff.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
LPA Ramirez conducted an exit interview with AD Ho, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
|