1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For example, S1 yells at R1 and other residents if they take too long in the shower or ask questions. R1 also reported Staff #2 (S2) yells at R1 and other residents. On 2/12/20, LPAs interviewed another resident who corroborated that S2 “always” raises their voice at residents and S1 yells at residents. On 1/28/21, LPAs interviewed S2 who denied yelling at residents and stated if they raise their voice it is due to resident hearing issues. Notwithstanding S2’s statements, witnesses and residents corroborate that other facility staff yell at residents in a hostile manner, thereby creating a hostile and intimidating environment, and thus this allegation is substantiated.
On 2/11/20, a witness reported an issue with R1’s rent being increased. Per the witness, a facility invoice dated 1/26/20, and R1’s admission agreement dated 6/29/19, R1’s rent was $2,800 per month, with R1 paying $1,600 and the remaining $1,200 to be paid via government subsidy once the subsidy is approved. Per a 60-Day Notice to Change the Terms of Your Rental Agreement, dated 1/15/20 and effective 4/1/20, R1’s rent was raised from $1,600 to $3,100 per month, an increase of $1,500, but no reason for the increase was provided in the notice. On 1/26/21, LPAs interviewed AD who stated R1 paid via check, the facility does not know where R1’s rent money came from, R1 moved out during the 60-day notice period, the government subsidy was never paid to the facility, and up until R1 moved out R1’s responsible party was still waiting on a response from the government agency regarding the subsidy. The 60-day notice did not indicate the reason for the rent increase or a general summary of additional costs that led to the increase as required by regulations and the admission agreement, which mirrors applicable regulations and states “In the event of a rate increase, we will include with the notice of the increase the reasons for the increase and a general summary of the additional costs that led to the increase” on pages 7-8 , thus this allegation is substantiated.
On 1/17/20, a witness reported that they were at the facility and observed feces in R1’s room, bathroom, and the hallway bathroom. On 2/12/20, LPAs interviewed R1 who stated that R1’s linens are not changed regularly, the facility and its bathrooms are not cleaned regularly, and the facility staff take an unreasonable amount of time to clean spills or stains after R1 requests cleaning. R1 provided LPAs with pictures dated between 1/17 and 2/6/20 showing: stains on R1’s carpet, stains on R1’s bed, and stains and feces on R1’s toilet. On 2/12/20, another witness reported that while they were recently at the facility they observed feces on the floor of the common bathrooms and that the common bathrooms lacked paper towels or toilet paper. This witness reported seeing the common bathrooms in this state multiple times. Thus, the facility did not provide a clean and sanitary environment and this allegation is substantiated. An immediate civil penalty is being assessed in the amount of $250 for a repeat violation of the same citation previously issued on 03/08/2021. The civil penalty shall be assessed until the violation is corrected. (Page 2) |