1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | that S1 had squeezed the resident’s face, put the staff’s hands all over the resident’s body and showed R1 their genitals. The facility management was notified as well as Buena Park Police. R1 was instantly assessed and no injuries noted. S1 was immediately put on unpaid leave and was subsequently terminated from employment at the facility. Police Detectives and Department Investigators interviewed S1 who denied the allegation and any wrongdoing. When R1 was interviewed, they were unable to corroborate the allegation and denied anything had happened. Buena Park Police Detectives interviewed R1 and R1 is unable to recall incident. Detective were unable to collect any DNA.
On 10/29/2020, a CareMore Nurse Practitioner assessed R1 and found no evidence of visible injuries or physical evidence to support the allegation of physical or sexual abuse. The Nurse Practitioner indicated that misinterpreting other’s actions are part of the disease process for Dementia and believes that is the case in this situation. Staff members who were interviewed state R1 gave conflicting statements to each and subsequently did not remember the incident. R1’s Responsible Party (RP) states R1 is in a childlike state and observes the Dementia is worsening. RP does not believe the incident occurred however, RP previously requested only female caregivers assist R1 for better results.
R1’s Physician Report dated 02/13/2020 indicates R1 is diagnosed with Dementia with behavioral disturbances as well as depression. R1 is prone to aggression, delusion, and exit seeking behaviors. The facility documentation obtained and reviewed dated 11/26/2018 revealed S1 received a verbal and written warning for failure to follow instructions, substandard work performance, and improper and/or unprofessional conduct. S1 indicated their intent at making improvements to their work performance.
There is not enough evidence or corroborating information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report and confidential names list was provided to Administrator. |