1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099, and the RP did not provide any guidance on how they wanted to proceed in regard to assisting R1 even though the Administrator informed RP that they could hire a care companion to feed or assist the client beyond the services provided by the facility, because the facility does not feed the residents directly and does not have staff sit with the resident during meal time to continually encourage eating during meal time. RP for R1 verified this information. Staff interviewed, reported that they encourage all residents to eat and bring the food to residents whether it is in the dining room or the resident’s room. It was reported that R1 did not eat for 2 days. Even though staff reported that R1’s food intake was decreasing no one interviewed could corroborate that R1 did not eat for 2 days. R1’s spouse had recently passed away and R1 was on hospice, staff interviewed and R1’s RP corroborated this information. All parties interviewed agreed that food was provided to R1 and that staff did ask R1 to eat but they did not sit with R1 while they ate and did not feed R1 directly. Based on the evidence gathered through interviews and records review the allegation, staff failed to ensure residents eating needs are being met while in care, are deemed unfounded, meaning the Department has found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the allegation. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report provided. |