1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The hospice nurse arrived soon after and administered the Morphine medication. LPA Chin reviewed the hospice medication list which indicates that Morphine is to be given every two hours as needed.
It was alleged that R2 was restrained with a belt on her wheelchair. LPA Chin has visited the facility on two occasions. On both visits, R2 was not restrained and was observed sitting in the dining table without a wheelchair. LPA Celine De Perio has visited the facility and stated that she has not observed R2 to be restrained on her wheelchair. LPA attempted to interview R2 but was unable due to cognitive impairment. S1 and S2 stated that R2 has never been restrained. R2 is on hospice care since July 27, 2021.
It was alleged that S1 offered the responsible party of R1 medication for R1 that was not ordered by the doctor in order to help R1 sleep better. LPA interviewed S1 and he denied that he ever offered any medication to help the resident sleep better. S1 said that he only gives his residents medications that their doctors have ordered. LPA interviewed S2 and she said she passes out medications only ordered by the resident's doctors and nothing more.
R1 moved into the facility on December 30, 2021 and moved out on January 5, 2022. R1's responsible party did not provide a thirty day notice. S1 stated that the hospice agency nurse informed him of R1's moving out of the facility the same day that R1 moved out. S1 had no prior knowledge. R1's responsible party signed a document that they were moving R1 out of the facility on January 5, 2022 and there would be no refund.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the following allegations: Staff were not adequately assisting the resident with the administration of medications, Staff is using restraints on a resident, Staff offered medication to authorized representative for resident that was not ordered by the doctor, The owner did not terminate the contract upon death of the resident are deemed Unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, appeal rights explained and provided. A copy of this report was provided during the visit to Juan Trujillo, Administrator. |