1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | issue. Facility formalized a written memo on the protocol in the case that residents have a noise complaint. S1 indicated that residents with concerns have also been address on a one to one meeting. S1 indicated that residents were also referred to review the pet policy in the resident’s handbook. Residents handbook page 21 states “Upon written approval of the Executive Director and payment of a non-refundable pet fee, small pets are allowed on designated floors. This policy was established to address the community concerns of cleanliness, health, and convenience. Pets are not permitted in any of the interior common areas, or surrounding areas. Pets are never to be left unattended outside the resident’s apartment. While under the owner’s supervision and on a leash, pets may use the community grounds.” Interviews conducted with residents revealed that there are no concerns with loud dog barking noise or if they have heard a dog bark it is very faint. Residents did not express having a noise complaint or have any issues with dogs barking in the facility or loud noise coming from other residents’ apartments. Based on the information received from interviews, the lack of information regarding facility noise in question, and the lack of corroborating witnesses, LPA is unable to determine if the alleged violation occurred as reported.
Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, these allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility. |