1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | resident during that time in ways to keep cool as needed. On town hall meeting held at the facility reflects that residents were notified and kept up to date on the status of the repairs. Service report from Ontario Refrigeration reflects maintenance had been started to correct the issue and reflect that parts had been ordered for replacement. Records review also reflect that facility Maintenance Director was kept in active on the status of the repairs with constant communication between facility and service repair company. Interviews conducted with facility residents revealed that they didn’t have any complaints as to the temperature. Residents stated, “the temperature outside wasn’t too hot that affected the temperature in the building.” LPA Martinez at the time of visit on 05/03/2022 measured temperature through out the building and it measured at 78.2 Fahrenheit Degrees, which is within Tittle 22 regulations. LPA did notice that air was flowing through the vents in the hallways and throughout the facility. Staff (S2) indicated that the facility cooling system is run by circuits 1 and 2. The cooling system is run on circuit 1 and circuit 2 is used as backup. It is alleged that facility did not ensure air conditioning pipes were being cleaned. Per interview with S2 revealed that air conditioning does not have pipes to be cleaned. S2 indicated that there is no such thing as a pipe associated with the air conditioning system. S2 indicated regular maintenance is done on the air conditioning system and unsure what is indicated as air conditioning pipes. The air conditioner is run by a chiller and a compressor. Base on the information received from interviews, and the lack of corroborating witnesses to the incidents, LPA is unable to determine if the alleged violations occurred as reported.
Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, these allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with facility representative and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility. |