1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | the week. Per interview with Executive Director/Administrator revealed that facility does not keep a log or notes when a resident refuses showers of misses a shower schedule. Interview with 11 out of 101 residents revealed that staff come to residents’ apartments to give showers. Residents indicated that there are times that residents may not be ready or are not in their room when it is time to shower staff will come back and check if resident is ready or will go into the facility to look for resident. Residents indicated that it’s rare if they miss a shower schedule, staff are good at re-scheduling residents and finding a slot where they can fit them in for showers. Based on interviews and records review, there wasn’t enough evidence to prove or refute that the allegation happened as reported.
It is alleged that facility is not providing food of the quality necessary to meet resident’s needs. LPA reviewed facility menu, observed the facilities food supply, and conducted interviews. It was observed that there were sufficient amount of quality and quantity of perishable and nonperishable food for residents. In addition, LPA obtained a copy of the facility weekly menu for review and observed the food service to be well balanced with a variety of choices. Menu reflects that facility offers a special, casual and freshzest option. The freshzest options is new and geared towards providing a vegetarian option for residents. Interview with Administrator revealed that, the facility has a freshzest menu as well to give residents a more vegan approach and if there are any vegetarian residents. LPA conducted interviews with residents and they expressed no concerns on the quality of the food provided. Interviews conducted with Executive Director indicated that generally, residents have no complaints about the quality but have different preferences of food served in which the facility makes an effort to accommodate. The facility has a comments/suggestion box at the facility and LPA obtained copies of resident comments about dinning food quality which revealed resident have a positive response to the quality of food served. Based on interviews and inspection of the food supply, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that food served is not of quality to meet resident's needs.
Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, these allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director/Administrator and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility. |