1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 3 out of 3 staff interviewed could not corroborate that report. The ED reported that he met with R1's responsible party (RP) in December 2022 and when the issue came up of assisting R1 with their oxygen concentrator and CPAP machine they suggested a home health aid, hospice, a skilled nursing facility or a private qualified caregiver to assist R1, because of Title 22 regulations they are not allowed to have staff operate the equipment for any resident..The ED reported that no resident who needs a higher level of care is ever retained or forced to stay at the facility. R1 no longer resides at the facility. Based on the evidence gathered through interviews and a review of records the allegation, facility retaining resident that requires a higher level of care is deemed, unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. |