1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099-A
Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure resident is kept in clean dry clothing at all times, the following has been concluded: The allegation is identical to the allegation that Staff do not ensure adequate incontinence care is provided to resident in care which was Substantiated and for which a type A citation was issued. In order not to cite the facility twice for the same deficiency, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Staff handled resident in a rough manner, the following has been concluded: Based on interviews conducted, multiple statements regarding potential rough handling of resident R1 by a facility former staff member were made. However, multiple contradictory statements were also made and no injury was evidence. There is therefore insufficient evidence to prove that the incident did occur, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Staff did not safeguard residents personal property, the following has been concluded: Several personal items belonging to R1 were reported as missing such as cosmetic products. Records reviewed indicated that the items in question had not been placed under the facility's safeguarding responsibility inventoried upon admission. Additionally, multiple lost items were later found in the resident's bedroom, and safeguarding solutions in the form of a lockbox were put into place. As a result, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that the facility was deficient, The allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. |