1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It is alleged that the staff inappropriately played with the client causing the client to feel uncomfortable. Based on the review of the IPP of Client #1 (C1), C1 does not have a history of making false accusations.
Although interviews revealed that two out of the three clients indicated feeling safe and comfortable around Staff #1 (S1), three out out of the three staff acknowledged that the prank to scare C1 transpired. It is determined based on the evidence obtained and the admission made by three out of three staff, the prank is in fact considered an inappropriate play.
Therefore, based on the interviews which were conducted and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Staff inappropriately played with client causing client to feel uncomfortable is deemed SUBSTANTIATED as per the Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 1 of the California Code of Regulations. A deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Edith Silva, and a copy of this report including the LIC9099C, LIC9099D, and the appeal rights were provided during today's visit. |