1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per progress notes, on February 2, 2026, R1 had an unwitnessed fall, 911 was called and R1 was sent out to the hospital. Per progress notes, staff contacted the hospital and were told that R1 had a stroke, had bruising but no fractures. During the interviews with witnesses, Witness 1 (W1) reported that they could not tell if R1's stroke was due to lack of care. During the interviews with residents, R2-R6 reported that if a resident sustains multiple falls that it is not due to lack of care and supervision. Per R3, there was a former resident that refused to use bed rails. R6 stated that they sustained one fall and reported that it was their fault. During the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that residents are told to wait but they refused, get agitated and try to help themselves and fall. Per S2, R1 did not sustain multiple falls due to lack of care and supervision.
Regarding the allegation that Licensee did not ensure facility staff is sufficient in numbers to meet the resident's needs, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed the Mainplace Senior Living staff schedule dated August and September 2026. Per staff schedule, on average there are six caregivers and two Medication Technicians (MTs) for the morning shift from 6:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m. and afternoon shift from 2:30 p.m.- 10:30 p.m. and two-three caregivers and one MT for the night shift from 10:30 p.m.-6:30 a.m. for 116 residents in care. During the interviews with residents, R2, R3, R5 and R6 reported that the facility has enough staff to meet the residents needs. Per R4, the facility needs more staff. During the interviews with staff, S1 reported that during their shift they have enough staff to meet the residents needs. S2 stated that the facility has enough staff to care for the residents and reported that they have enough time to assist the residents during their shift.
Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not respond to the call buttons timely, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed the Mainplace Senior Living call light response times dated January 26, 2026, through January 30, 2026, for R1. Per response times, staff responded to the call light within one minute and 45 seconds to 35 minutes and 41 seconds. LPA also reviewed the response times dated August 31, 2026. Per response times, staff responded to the call light within 10 seconds to 35 minutes and 38 seconds. During the interviews with residents, R2, R4, R5 and R6 reported that staff respond to the call light in a timely manner. R4 reported that staff respond to the call light within five to 15 minutes. R5 stated that staff respond within 20 minutes and reported that they are satisfy. During the interviews with staff, S1 reported that on average they respond to the call light as soon as possible or within a couple of minutes.
CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C... |