1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation, Financial abuse of a resident, the investigation revealed the following. R1 had been paying the same amount of rent since the facility was owned and operated by the previous licensed owner. The admission agreement of R1 is still in effect. R1 and the facility verified that the amount listed on the rental agreement is what R1 should be paying but under the prior owner/operator R1 was allowed to pay an amount that is less than the agreed upon rent. The facility informed R1 he is expected to pay the amount listed in the rental agreement. R1 verified that he is aware of the rent amount he must pay but thought the facility would allow him to continue to pay less like the previous owner did. R1 acknowledged that he understood why the facility requested the rent amount and agreed to pay the correct amount of rent each month as stated in the rental agreement. R1 acknowledged that paying the agreed upon rent, even if it is an increase in what he expected to pay or use to pay in the past, is not considered financial abuse. Therefore the allegation, Financial abuse of a resident, is deemed unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and a copy of the report provided. |