1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | But all residents interviewed stated they have agreed to participate in a new election and agreed to abide by the results. Based on the evidence gathered through interviews of the staff and residents the allegation, facility is interfering in resident council, is deemed unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. In regards to the allegation staff spoke inappropriately to resident, the investigation revealed the following; staff interviewed including the Administrator were unaware of any staff speaking inappropriately to any residents. 1 out of 5 residents interviewed reported staff could be rude to them but wasn't sure if amounted to inappropriately speaking to them. 4 out of 5 residents reported that they had no issues with staff. Based on the information gathered through interviews the allegation, staff spoke inappropriately to resident is deemed unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. |