1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The records review showed R1 was not prescribed Temazepam in August 2020 or for the first 3 weeks of September 2020. Facility staff reported that R1 has received all their prescribed medication. R1 reported that they have received all their medication except Dulcolax and Temazepam. Facility staff reported they contacted R1’s doctor informing the doctor R1 requested Temazepam. R1 reported they contacted their doctor to request Temazepam. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation. Based on the evidence gathered through record review and interviews the allegation is deemed to be, Unfounded, meaning the allegation is false could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
In regard to the allegation, resident bathroom is not wheelchair accessible, the investigation revealed the following, R1 uses a wheelchair and reported the bathroom doorway is not wide enough for the wheelchair to pass through. When this information was made known to the facility the Administrator offered R1 a new room with a wider bathroom doorway for the same monthly rent as R1’s current room. R1 refused and insisted that the doorway be widened because R1 did not wish to change rooms. The Administrator explained to R1 that widening the doorway would not be possible and would change the walls of the room and require extensive work for many days. The Administrator informed R1 that moving to a new room which has more space and a larger bathroom would be beneficial, but R1 refused to move. R1 reported that they would make do and get into and out of the bathroom even though the wheelchair rubs the doorway. The facility was willing to accommodate R1 by providing him a larger room with a larger bathroom without an increase in rent when R1 reported the bathroom doorway would not accommodate the wheelchair but R1 refused to move and insisted on staying in their current room. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation is false could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
In regard to the allegation, resident’s bathing needs are not being met, the investigation revealed the following, R1’s admission agreement specifies R1 agreed to receive bathing twice a week. R1 verified the admission agreement is correct. R1 reported they were receiving bathing 3 times a week. Administrator and R1 verified that for around two weeks R1 was receiving home health services from a third party after he discharged from the hospital. Part of the home health service was to provide bathing assistance once a week. This was temporary to assist R1 after they came home from the hospital. R1 reported they should continue to receive bathing 3 times a week. Staff reported they informed R1 the third bath a week was provided from a third party and not part of his regular services he receives from the facility.
|