1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
The investigation into the allegation, staff do not answer phone, revealed the following: It was alleged that when Resident 1’s (R1) family call the facility, staff do not answer the phone. No dates and time were provided when the staff do not answer the phone. 6 out of 6 staff interviewed reported that the facility phone is always answered. LPA called the facility on the day of the 10-day visit and 5 times after the initial 10-day visit. Each time the LPA called facility staff answered the phone. 4 out of 4 residents interviewed reported that when they call the front desk from their cell phones someone always answers. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation, staff do not answer phone, is deemed, unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report provided. |