1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 and R2 reported the room is fine and has enough room for both residents and the temperature is fine. Based on the evidence gathered, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation, resident’s property is not being protected, the investigation revealed the following. It was reported that Resident 1’s (R1) clothing and shoes were lost during their move to a new room. A review of records shows that there is no inventory list for R1’s property. R1 could not verify the exact items that were missing. The Administrator reported that when R1 moved to a new room, R1 was present as staff put R1’s belongings in boxes. The Administrator reported that R1 supervised the packing of their items and when everything was packed it was all moved at the same time to their new room and unpacked as R1 watched. 3 out of 3 staff interviewed reported that R1 was present while everything was moved. R1 verified that they were present during each step of the move. It was reported that the facility threw out R1’s refrigerator. The Administrator reported that R1’s personal refrigerator was inoperable, was leaking and only blew warm air. R1 verified this report. The Administrator reported that R1 agreed to have the refrigerator thrown out because it didn’t work. R1 verified this report. R1 verified that none of their personal items were given to the facility to safeguard.
Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator, and a copy of the report provided. |