1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation, “Facility staff did not adequately supervise R1,” the Department reviewed a psychological assessment completed in October 2025. The assessment documented that R1 required extensive redirection and assistance from two people.
The Department interviewed the facility Administrator who confirmed that the facility specialized in memory care and generally assigned one caregiver for every nine residents, in addition to charge nurses assigned to each shift. They acknowledged that R1 experienced a progressive decline and sustained several falls. Staff escorted R1 to and from her room, meals, and activities; however, R1 continued to walk independently with her walker.
Administrator confirmed that R1 experienced 12 fall-related incidents between July and December 2025 and stated that following R1’s first fall, the facility provided R1 with a high-low medical bed and placed a fall mat in her room. However, Administrator acknowledged that the facility did not make any additional changes to R1’s treatment or supervision plan following the second fall or any subsequent falls. They also acknowledged that the facility did not formally discuss placing R1 under one-to-one supervision, did not offer the private-duty caregiving option identified in the Residency Agreement, and did not discuss transferring R1 to a higher level of care. S1 further acknowledged that R1 required assistance from two caregivers. Despite R1’s repeated falls, unexplained injuries, and increased need for assistance, the facility did not formally consider these options. Interviews were conducted with R1’s sons who reported conflicting statements about R1’s care received.
Per Administrator, R1’s family privately arranged for a caregiver to visit R1 and provide companionship. However, the caregiver’s visits varied, lasted approximately four to five hours, and did not occur every day. Therefore, this arrangement did not provide continuous supervision or replace the facility’s responsibility to develop and implement an appropriate supervision plan.
Hospice records documented that R1 began receiving hospice services in December 2025. The records identified repeated falls, wheelchair dependence, and the need for assistance with personal care, and pain related to R1’s right shoulder dislocation. Hospice records stated that R1 could not meaningfully communicate her needs or discomfort and that using a walker had become a safety concern because R1 frequently forgot to use it. {***CONTINUE9099C***} |