1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED...LPA Quiroz attempted to greet and interview R1, however R1 looked away and did not respond to LPA Quiroz’s greet. Four of Five interviewees indicated R1 tends to walk around the facility and in R1s bedroom area and not careful about bumping into furniture or other items. LPA Quiroz attempted to interview Five of six residents, however LPA Quiroz was not able to qualify Five of six residents in care due to cognitive impairment diagnoses. Resident 6 (R6) denied physical abuse while in care from staff or other residents indicating “staff are very nice and I love the healthy soups we eat here.”
Regarding the allegation: “Food service is not adequate,” the investigation revealed the following: Five of five interviewees consisting of staff and resident denied the allegation indicating current residents residing at the facility enjoy eating soups and that when served other food entrees that current residents in care are observed not to eat the food. During Facility inspection visit conducted on 10/28/2021 on or about 9:50am, while LPA Quiroz toured the kitchen area, LPA Quiroz observed adequate amount of perishable and non- perishable food items. Title 22 California Code of Regulation 87555 :General Food Service Requirements(b)(3)(5) indicate that (3)between- meal nourishment or snacks shall be made available for all residents unless limited by dietary restrictions prescribed by a physician. (5)Meals shall consist of an appropriate variety of foods and shall be planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents.
Based on the evidence gathered from interviews conducted, facility inspection observations, and documentation review, the allegation of "Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care” and “Food service is not adequate” is deemed Unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis; Therefore complaint allegations are dismissed.
LPA Quiroz attempted to call (L/AD) Nathan Quy via telephone to conduct exit interview, however (L/AD) Nathan Quy did not answer. Detailed voicemail with findings and instructions to submit copy of signed report to Community Care Licensed were provided to (L/AD) Nathan Quy via voicemail. A copy of this report along with LIC 811- Confidential Names list were provided to (L/AD) Quy via email on today's date. |