1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Because the facility records and staff interviews indicate the resident was able to walk without assistance, it cannot be determined if the fall was a result of staff neglect.
2. & 3. Interviews with staff and witnesses stated the resident started to decline quickly and refused to eat and drink. Staff are not allowed to force a resident to eat and drink. Witnesses stated the resident was declining and observed food and liquids in the resident’s room. Other interviews stated staff did not take the time to ensure resident ate all that the resident wanted to eat. The department cannot prove or disprove the resident became severely dehydrated and malnourished due to staff neglect.
4. A review of the records showed the resident started hospice care with one hospice agency and ended with another one. The resident had a fall that resulted in the resident becoming bedridden and required to be turned every two hours. The change in condition was noted in the resident’s hospice care plans but a log was not completed by staff. A log is not required per Title 22 regulations. Interviews also stated the resident declined quickly and was in poor health. Because logs to keep record of when a resident is turned per the care plan is not required and the resident’s health condition it cannot be determined if the resident developed an unstageable pressure injury due to neglect.
5. Per Title 22 regulations, resident records shall be made available to a person designated with the written consent of the resident. LPA was unable to review the resident's record. LPA was unable to determine what records were requested by the resident's responsible party.
Therefore, LPA finds the allegation to be "unsubstantiated." A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the violation occurred. |