1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 2. A review of the resident's file showed the client refused to have their personal belongings inventoried, but it was not signed or initialed by the resident or their responsible party. The belongings in question were a pair of shoes and wheelchair. Facility staff at the time stated the belongings were picked up and the witness stated the items were never returned. Because the inventory list was not signed or initialed it cannot be determined if the facility was responsible for keeping track of the resident's personal belongings.
3. A review of the admission agreement stated there was a pre-admission fee charged that was to be used for the rent as well and there is a refund schedule that is required by CA Health and Safety Code. The admission agreement also requires a 30 day notice of termination by the resident and/or responsible party. The resident in question was in the facility only for one week before sustaining a fall and not returning. A review of the resident's file indicates there was a refund issued but it cannot be determined if it is the correct amount because there is noting in the file indicating the pre-admission fee was paid by the resident's responsible party.
Therefore, LPA finds the allegation to be "unsubstantiated." A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the violation occurred. |