1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | This incident occurred shortly after the resident moved in. There were notes that the staff were instructed to be aware of the resident’s whereabouts and a possible one-one-one, but did not specify how long that was going to last. It cannot be determined if R1 was an elopement risk prior to moving into the facility because it cannot be determined if the resident had exit seeking behaviors prior to the first incident and the second two incidents the resident didn’t leave the facility grounds.
2. Title 22 regulations at the time required appraisals and needs/services plans to be updated when there was a change in condition or every twelve months, whichever came first. However, the regulations do not specify how much detail is required for each appraisal and needs/service plan to be. A review or R1’s file showed the resident’s needs and services plan was updated at least once after the resident moved in. Supervision was addressed, but because the regulations don’t specify how detailed the plan is supposed to be, it cannot be determined whether the appraisal met the resident’s needs or not.
Therefore, LPA finds the allegation to be "unsubstantiated." A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the violation occurred. |