1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that Staff admitted resident against their will, it was reported that R1 does not have Dementia, lives on their own, and is not conserved. R1 moved into the facility on April 24, 2026, and moved out of the facility on April 30, 2026. LPA reviewed the admission agreement for R1. R1’s responsible party signed the admission agreement on R1’s behalf. R1 was previously living on their own with In-Home-Supportive Services. Per review of medical assessment dated November 20, 2025, R1 is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease, history of hysterectomy, osteopenia, urinary incontinence, and major depressive disorder. R1 also experienced disorientation, is unable to bathe or groom self, has bladder incontinence, unable to administer own medication, and is non-ambulatory due to medical condition. R1 lived independently with In Home Supportive Services until a hospital visit on April 24, 2026. Witnesses reported that R1 was discharged from the hospital to the facility because the hospital would not discharge R1 to their own home. LPA attempted to interview the hospital social worker, but they refused to answer any questions. Two out of six residents interviewed, including R1, stated R1 was admitted against their will by family. R1 reported they did not want to move to the facility but were made to do so by a family member. 1 out 5 residents reported that they thought R1 was moved into the facility against their will by their family. 4 out of 5 residents interviewed had no knowledge of the incident. Three out of five staff stated the family admitted the resident to the facility. Two out of five staff had no relevant information regarding this allegation. LPA interviewed 4 witnesses who had knowledge of the allegation, 2 family members, a friend of R1 and R1’s former IHSS worker. The IHSS worker reported that the family moved the resident into the facility. The IHSS worker reported that R1 did not have the ability to live on their own. LPA interviewed 2 family members of R1 who reported that R1 was not equipped to live on their own, so they moved R1 into the facility. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation because the facility staff did not seek R1 as a client because R1’s family members and the hospital acted to move R1 into the facility.
Regarding the allegation that staff chemically restrained resident, it was reported that staff used medication to sedate resident. It was alleged that the sedative, Depakote, was used to restrict R1’s movements. Per medical assessment dated November 20, 2025, R1 was not prescribed Depakote at the time. Per physician’s report dated April 24, 2026, R1 was prescribed Divalproex (Depakote) 125 mg for restlessness, anxiety, and agitation. This medication was prescribed to R1 while they were at the hospital. R1 was admitted to the facility with a list of medications, which included Divalproex (Depakote) 125 mg. Six out of six staff interviewed stated medication is administered according to the physician’s orders. Continued on LIC9099-C.
|