1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | After the fall incident, medical records obtained confirm R1 was seen at least once every four weeks by their attending physician, as documented in visits dated 07/14/2020, 08/25/2020, 09/03/2020, 09/17/2020, 10/01/2020, 11/10/2020, 12/07/2020 and 12/29/2020. Monitoring of R1's skin condition is documented on each report and confirms the absence of sores or decubiti injuries until report dated 01/28/2021. Per medical records obtained, R1 was documented as having a newly occurred wound on the lower right posterior leg, followed up by a consultation on 02/03/2021 due to the wound worsening.
Following the medical assessment of the wound in late January/early February 2021, a referral for a wound care intervention was put into motion. Surveillance notes obtained from the wound care specialists note that caregivers reported that the wound occurred in January of 2021 and showed no progress since onset. The wound specialist notes further indicate that the wound incidence is “unavoidable due to Advanced Age; Decreased mental awareness; Fragile skin; Friction; Immobility or limited mobility; Medical Comorbidities; Vascular Factor.”
Resident was attended by home health regularly in addition to bi-weekly wound care continuously after that initial referral. Complete progress notes were obtained with detailed monitoring of the resident's condition throughout by a Home Health agency. Hospital records obtained dated 7/25/2022 show that R1 was hospitalized after the Home Health agency noted R1 had an altered level of consciousness. While at the hospital R1 was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis of the right vulva extending to the right inguinal region requiring surgery for debridement. At the time of incident R1 had a foley catheter in place which was being monitored by R1’s Home Health agency.
Although documentation obtained reveals R1 sustained a wound while in care, records obtained confirm facility staff ensured R1 received regular treatment for wound from Home Health Agency and sought medical treatment the same day Home Health nurses noted R1’s altered level of consciousness. Two of two staff interviewed confirmed R1 was receiving services from skilled medical professionals while at the facility. R1 was unable to be interviewed at the time of investigation due to being on a ventilator.
Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the allegations Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident and Resident was not regularly observed for changes in condition are deemed to be unfounded, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
An exit interview was conducted with the facility representative and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |