1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continued from LIC9099)
On 1/3/2025 LPA conducted a visit to the facility to initiate investigation into the above allegation. LPA obtained copies of the resident roster, staff roster and discharge letters. LPA reviewed a discharge letter for Client 4 (C4) and a discharge letter for Client 5 (C5). LPA observed C4 signed their discharge letter on 11/1/2024 and the Discharge Planner signed it on 11/7/2024. LPA observed C5 signed their discharge letter on 11/10/2024 and the Discharge Planner signed it on 11/13/2024. LPA interviewed 3 staff (S1, S2, S3). 3 out of 3 staff stated that, C4's discharge was an unexpected discharge. 3 out of 3 staff stated that, C5's discharge occurred on a weekend. 3 out of 3 staff stated that the Discharge Planner may not be available to review the discharge paperwork with clients if there is an unexpected discharge or if the discharge occurs on a weekend. 3 out of 3 staff stated that, if the Discharge Planner is unavailable at the time of discharge, an available staff member will review the discharge letter with the client.
LPA advised the facility to document who reviews the discharge letter with the client if the Discharge Planner is unavailable. LPA issued a Technical Advisory (TA).
Based on observations, interviews conducted and records reviewed there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation of "Facility did not follow program plan due to not following discharge procedure." Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid; there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with facility staff. A copy of this LIC-9099 was provided to the facility. |