1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that the facility does not have an approved program certification from the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS): it was alleged that the facility’s certification expired May 18, 2024, the facility was advised it would not be issued a new certification until it had an approved Program Director at the facility, and the facility had submitted some potential candidates for Program Director that did not meet DHCS’ minimum requirements. LPA reviewed the facility’s DHCS Certification dated May 18, 2023, which indicates an expiration date of May 18, 2024. LPA reviewed a witness statement dated June 13, 2024, which corroborates that the certification is expired. LPA interviewed CD and LE who admitted that DHCS did not issue a new certification because DHCS had not yet approved a new Program Director for this facility. However, while the certification is expired, the information obtained revealed that the facility is going through the plan of correction process with DHCS and is working towards compliance and that the facility is still considered to be actively certified by DHCS. The information obtained did not corroborate the allegation.
Regarding the allegation that the facility did not answer telephone calls promptly and completely: it was alleged that the facility has not been in contact with DHCS since the expiration of their certification on May 18, 2024, and DHCS emailed and left voicemails for facility representatives but has not been able to make contact with facility representatives. LPA reviewed a witness statement dated June 13, 2024, which corroborated the allegation. LPA interviewed CD who could not provide information regarding this allegation. LPA interviewed LE who denied the allegation, stating LE and other facility staff were very responsive to DHCS staff and responded to phone calls and emails to the best of their ability. The information obtained is conflicting.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the Department is unable to ascertain if the above allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative.
This is an amended report |