1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that the facility staff failed to meet residents’ needs: it was alleged that on 03/09/24, R1 was observed soiled, staff would not change R1 on the basis that R1 refuses changes, and R1 has been observed to be soiled on multiple occasions. LPA interviewed AD who reported that R1 does receive incontinence care at the facility and that incontinence care provided is documented, but that the staff do not always properly document when incontinence care was provided. LPA reviewed R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 10/04/23, R1’s Needs and Services Plan dated 10/04/23, and R1’s Physician’s Report dated 05/02/23 which state that R1 needs assistance with incontinence care. LPA reviewed the facility’s Caregiver Resident Assignments which shows that R1 should be checked on by staff three times per shift to see if R1 needs incontinence care. However, the facility’s Incontinence Care Logs for 03/09/24 do not indicate R1 received incontinence care on that day. LPA interviewed nine residents, none of whom corroborated the allegation. LPA conducted health and safety checks on the nine residents, observed no health and safety issues, and observed the residents to be clean and in good spirits. LPA inspected the nine resident’s rooms and observed the rooms to be clean and free from odor. LPA observed the facility has a sufficient supply of incontinence supplies. LPA interviewed four staff who reported that although R1 does need incontinence care, R1 is able to change their own diapers and will sometimes refuse help from staff. The staff stated that R1 is generally able to change their own diapers, but that they also make sure R1 properly changed their diaper if R1 refused help and chose to change it themselves. LPA’s interview with R1 corroborated the staff’s statements and R1 reported no issues regarding incontinence care at the facility.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the Department is unable to ascertain if the above allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative. |