1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Two out of two staff interviews conducted confirmed there was no admission agreement on file for C2. Based on the evidence gathering during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation that, facility is not following the plan of operation, the following has been concluded: LPA reviewed the discharge summary for C2 dated August 15, 2025, and the discharge summary for C3 dated August 8, 2025. LPA observed that in the discharge summary for C2, it does not state the reason C2 was discharged from the facility. LPA also observed that in the discharge summary for C3, it does not state the reason C3 was discharged from the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's plan of operation which states the discharge plan instructions. Per the facility's discharge plan instructions, there shall be a discharge summary for each client within twenty four hours of discharge and it shall include the reason the client was discharged from the facility. Based on the evidence gathering during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Residential Supervisor Jenna Ortiz. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided. |