1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with two different witnesses, both expressed that they do not believe C1 has been restricted in anyway. Witness 1 (W1) stated this concern just came up during a July 2025 meeting. Witness 2 (W2) stated they do not believe C1’s has been restricted in any way. Witness 2 says everyone involved has the clients best interest in mind. W2 says that has been expressed to the client as well.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews and document review, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. |