1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that staff do not maintain facility free from hazard. It was alleged that staff left staples around the facility accessible. The investigation revealed the following: LPA toured the facility. LPA didn’t observe any exposed staples at the facility at the time. One out of five clients interviewed stated they have seen scissors exposed. LPA was unable to reach the remaining four clients. Four out of five staff interviewed stated that they do not have exposed staples at the facility.
It was alleged that staff did not safeguard residents’ confidential information. It was alleged that staff spoke to other staff in the vicinity of residents. One out of five clients interviewed stated that they have heard staff gossip among clients. Two out of six staff interviewed stated there was an incident where staff discussed client information in front of another client. Staff denied allegations. Corrective action was implemented regardless.
It was alleged that staff purchased a nicotine vape device for non-dependent minor. It was reported that at the time, client was under the age of 21. LPA toured the facility during the investigation. One out of five clients interviewed reported that they have seen staff vape, but could not confirm whether they had purchased a device for a minor. Six out of six staff denied the allegation.
Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the allegations are found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the present report was provided to a facility representative. Appeal Rights were reviewed.
|