| Allegation: Resident not changed timely- Unsubstantiated
Interviews with staff indicated that caregivers are assigned residents at the beginning of their shift, which means they are to assist with those residents with incontinence care needs. Staff interviews further revealed that residents are assisted with incontinence care every two hours or as needed. Residents will also utilize their pendant if they need assistance between that time. Resident interviews revealed that staff meet their incontinence needs. Residents indicated they feel comfortable with staff and will use their pendants or staff will just check on them.
Allegation: Due to neglect, Resident received a fracture while in care- Unsubstantiated
According to facility staff, R1 had unwitnessed fall while at the facility. The first one in November 2022 and the second one in January 2023. R1 was evaluated by facility LVN on both occasions. R1 had no visible injuries, complaints of pain and when they were helped to their feet, they were able to walk without any complaints or signs of pain.
Staff indicated that R1 was walking without assistances or signs of pain up until the day they were first transported the hospital on 03/11/2023.
During R1’s visit to the hospital on 03/11/2023, record review indicated R1 had a Severe T8 Compression Fracture. Records reviewed did not contain any further details or how the fracture may have occurred or was treated.
R1 had a follow up visit at the hospital on 04/04/2023. R1 was diagnosed with “Chronic appearing T8 Compression Fracture” Interview with medical professional revealed it is common for someone R1s age to suffer compression fractures and there is no way for them to determine the age of the injury or when it may have occurred.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided and appeal rights provided.
|