1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the case management visit, LPA observed the shed to be used for storage with items located inside which included wheelchairs, mattresses, tables, portable AC units, and holiday decorations. During the visit, LPA did not observe any signs of residents or staff living inside of the shed. Based on the observations made during the Case Management visit conducted on June 25, 2025, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding that, facility was kept unclean, unsanitary, and not in good repair, the following has been concluded: During the Case Management visit conducted on June 25, 2025, LPA inspected the physical plant of the facility which included areas such as the dining room and the four resident bathrooms. LPA observed the dining room to be clean with furniture in good repair. LPA also observed the lights in the dining room to be operational at time of the visit. LPA additionally inspected the four resident bathrooms and observed them to be free of hazards. LPA observed the floors and the walls in resident bathrooms to be clean. LPA observed resident bathrooms to be equipped with grab bars and nonskid floor mats. Faucets and toilets were operational and did not have any missing parts. Based on the observations made during the Case Management visit conducted on June 25, 2025, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding that, facility auditory device was inoperable, the following has been concluded: During the Case Management visit conducted on June 25, 2025, LPA inspected the physical plant of the facility. During a tour of the facility, LPA observed that each auditory device placed on exit doors were operational, including the auditory device located on the door leading to the backyard. Based on the observations made during the Case Management visit conducted on June 25, 2025, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator (AD) Mar Jason Dasco and a copy of the report was provided.
|