1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Administrator, S1 and Staff 2 (S2) reported that R1’s responsible party never provided the hospital discharge paperwork for R1. The Administrator reported they ordered a palliative care visit from a Hospice company to have R1 and their injury evaluated. R1’s responsible party did not respond to requests for an interview. A review of R1’s records does not show R1 was ever diagnosed with an infection. R1’s care visit shows only one visit was completed on February 23, 2026, and no issues were noted. R1 was moved out of the facility on February 28, 2026. R1’s location is unknown, so they were not interviewed. R1 was injured and as soon as the facility discovered the injury 911 was called and R1 was taken to the hospital and treated. Upon R1’s return, facility staff scheduled a follow-up visit with a medical provider. R1’s records do not show any mention of an infection. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
The investigation into the allegation, staff did not seek medical attention to resident, revealed the following. It was reported that after R1 was injured staff did not get R1 medical attention. R1 suffered an injury on February 21, 2026. According to the special incident report (SIR) submitted by the facility to the Agency (Community Care Licensing) on February 25, 2026, R1 was discovered by staff at 5:50 am with a cut on their leg. Staff called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital and treated. Staff notified R1’s responsible party and their physician. It was reported that staff did not seek medical treatment for R1. S1 and S2 who were present when R1’s injury was discovered reported that R1’s injury was discovered during a routine check at 5:50 am. S1 reported that R1 told them they had injured themselves earlier but did not report the accident. S1 and S2 stated that they called 911 as soon as possible after seeing the injury. R1’s where abouts are unknown so they could not be interviewed. R1’s responsible party did not respond to requests for an interview. The Administrator, S1 and S2, reported that R1’s responsible party did not provide the hospital discharge paperwork for R1 and R1's responsible party brought R1 back to the facility after their hospital visit. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.
|