1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099
An additional witness interview was conducted via telephone with Regional Center of Orange County staff on June 18, 2024.
Regarding the allegation that Staff inappropriately exposed herself to a client, the following has been concluded: Staff member S1 gave the account that she shared a personal experience regarding her diagnosis of Stage 1 breast cancer with facility client C1 as a motivational speech attempt as the client was reporting feeling depressed. S1 denies any inappropriate exposure. A call to local law enforcement was made later the same day and did not result in a report being filed or any formal investigation. No other direct witnesses were present at the time, but staff, client and witness interviews conducted during the investigation concurred that the allegation was highly unlikely.
Regarding the allegation that Staff did not ensure resident had privacy, the following has been concluded: upon admission, C1 initially declined the offer of having a lock placed on her door for their own use and privacy before changing their mind and requesting a lock to be installed a few weeks later. During the tour of the physical plant, it was confirmed that the lock was in place, with C1 in possession of one of the keys, and a copy of the key maintained in the facility's office for safety reasons. Interviews conducted with facility clients and staff members confirm that adequate measures appear to be taken to ensure the clients' privacy.
Regarding the allegation that Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident, the following has been concluded: other staff members interviewed during the initial investigation all stated that no inappropriate comments or behavior had been witnessed during their time at the facility. A witness interview with Regional Center of Orange County Service Coordinator staff also evidenced the presence of a pattern of similar allegations being made by C1 at their previous placement facility in order to "sabotage [their] placement". Client interview conducted during the initial investigation also failed to corroborate any occurrence of inappropriate comments from staff being witnessed.
As a result of the investigation, the three allegations listed above are found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. |