1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Department interviewed 4 staff. 2 of 4 staff denied the allegations. 2 of 4 staff did not confirm or deny the allegations. 1 of 4 staff informed LPA that C1 was at the facility from January 11, 2025, until February 2, 2025.
Interviews with Witness #1 (W1) revealed that they went to the facility multiple times and noted there were locks on 3 of 4 bedrooms doors. W1 informed the Department that they verified that 3 of 4 clients could unlock the doors themselves if they were locked.
The Department interviewed 3 of 3 clients in care and 2 of 3 denied the allegation. 1 of 3 did not confirm or deny the allegation.
LPA was unable to interview C1 due to no longer residing at the facility.
LPA reviewed 2 of 4 staff have updated training on behaviors. 1 of 4 staff has an active administrators certificate.
Based on information gathered and interviews conducted, the Department is unable to ascertain if the above allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
|