1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per three of three staff interviewed, the locking mechanism on resident room doors is meant to protect residents’ privacy and safeguard personal belongings and is not designed to lock residents in. Three of three staff denied witnessing or having any knowledge of any resident being locked inside their room.
During interview, R1’s responsible party, Witness 1 (W1), stated they spent the night at the facility with R1 for six weeks and did not observe R1 or any other resident being locked inside their room. W1 denied ever witnessing R1's doorknob being placed on backwards to lock R1 inside their room. LPA attempted to interview R1, however, R1 no longer resides at the facility and a phone number where they could be reached was not available.
Based on information gathered, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation, “Facility locked resident inside a room”. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection. |