1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 was brought to the facility by two family members on July 1, 2025, at around 3:55PM per interview with AD. R1’s family advised AD that R1 had a history of Dementia but did not bring a completed physician’s report for R1. R1 was assigned to a room in assisted living and some of their personal belongings were placed in the room. Around 9:50PM, AD received a call from facility staff who reported that R1 had been in an accident and the police were at the facility. AD spoke with the police who reported that R1 had been hit by a car and was taken to the hospital. Hospital medical records obtained revealed R1 suffered several injuries including diagnosis of loss of consciousness, right subdural hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhage, parafalcine hemorrhage versus meningioma, T11 compression fracture, L2 vertebral body compression deformity, S3 sacral fracture with presacral hematoma, and bruising and abrasions.
Per interviews conducted with facility staff, R1’s family was with R1 at the facility until 7:30PM. After that time R1 was seen walking near the entrance of the facility and told staff they were waiting for their family to return. The front receptionist reported leaving at 9:00PM and had advised caregivers R1 was near the entrance. Per Police Report obtained, police responded to the scene on July 1, 2025, at 9:52PM after R1 was struck by a car.
AD stated that facility staff did not notice R1 leave the facility, and this was only discovered after the police arrived at the facility. AD stated they had left the facility a little after 5:00PM. Per interview conducted with AD, AD reported assisted living residents can leave the facility freely and the door is not locked. They further stated although R1’s family had reported that R1 had some Dementia, there was no physician’s report completed to determine whether R1 needed memory care or if they were authorized by their physician to leave unassisted. AD stated they had conducted an assessment of R1 prior to admission but did not document the results. AD further stated they did not know R1 was staying the night at the facility as R1 had arrived late in the day and they had told R1’s family that R1 could not be admitted without a physician’s report. When asked why they allowed R1’s family to move R1’s personal belongings into R1’s room, AD stated that it was for the future and they expected the family to come back the following day with the proper paperwork completed. Per AD, an admission agreement had been completed, but no money was exchanged. When interviewed, R1’s responsible party confirmed that they were going to move R1 in that night. R1’s responsible party saw that the facility had staff to look after R1 and had been told by AD that R1 would be looked after and taken care of. R1’s responsible party was unable to confirm whether R1 understood they were now going to be living at the facility and stated R1 kept trying to follow them out of the facility but was redirected back to their room. R1’s family reported that following the accident, R1 needed rehabilitation for two months and is unable to communicate as well as they previously could. |