1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Complainant stated R1’s wedding ring is very tight fitted and would not easily slip off R1’s finger without someone removing it forcefully. LPA interviewed seven (7) facility staff and R1’s husband who resides in the assisted living side regarding the missing diamond ring. Based on statements received, management was notified, and a search was conducted by facility staff. Staff was unable to locate the diamond ring. LPA interviewed four (4) staff and received consistent statements. LPA interviewed Administrator and Memory Care Director regarding the missing diamond ring. Memory Care Director stated R1’s husband and daughter were notified right away when the missing ring was brought to his attention by staff. Administrator stated during admission the facility reviewed policy with future residents that expensive jewelry not be left with the resident and this is pointed out in the Residence Agreement under F3.
LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement under F3 states, Oakmont shall not be responsible for the loss of any personal property belonging to you due to theft, fire, or any other causes, unless the loss or damage was caused by negligence of Oakmont or it’s employee.
Based upon the information obtained during the investigation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation may have happened or is valid, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Austria Smith, Administrator. A copy of this report will be sent to Administrator via email. A signed copy of this report will be emailed to LPA.
|